A Change In Emphasis

It is clear from the record (I have not posted here for about 12 months) that I have little appetite to continue digging into detailed ancestry records and then publishing the results.

However, judging by the questions and comments I get, there is still substantial interest in the colonial history and conditions in which the people mentioned in this blog lived their lives. Since I have already done the research necessary, from time to time I will publish some of the background data I collected many years ago, and I will republish some of the ancestral and historical pieces I have already published here and elsewhere.

Dalrymple on East India Company’s Robert Clive

Dalrymple is by far the best historian of “The Raj”. I have reproduced his Guardian article in its entirety below. The emphasis is mine.

The statue of Robert Clive stands outside the Foreign Office. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Robert Clive was a vicious asset-stripper. His statue has no place on Whitehall

William Dalrymple

Honouring the man once known as Lord Vulture is a testament to British ignorance of our imperial past

When Robert Clive, who established British rule in India, died by his own hand in 1774, he was widely reviled as one of the most hated men in England.

His body was buried in a secret night-time ceremony, in an unmarked grave, without a plaque. Clive left no suicide note, but Samuel Johnson reflected the widespread view as to his motives: Clive “had acquired his fortune by such crimes that his consciousness of them impelled him to cut his own throat”.

Clive’s death followed soon after two whistleblowers had revealed the scale of the devastation and asset-stripping of Bengal under his rule. “We have murdered, deposed, plundered and usurped,” wrote Horace Walpole. “Say what think you of the famine in Bengal, in which three millions perished, being caused by a monopoly of the provisions by the East India Company?” That summer, a satire was published in London lampooning Clive as Lord Vulture, an unstable imperial harpy, “utterly deaf to every sentiment of justice and humanity… whose avarice knows no bounds”.

Clive was hauled before parliament with calls to strip him of both his peerage and his wealth. The select committee found, in addition to lucrative insider dealing, that “presents” worth over £2m had been distributed in Bengal, and recommended that the “very great sums of money … appropriated” by Clive and his henchmen be reimbursed. Despite escaping formal censure, Clive came to be seen as the monstrous embodiment of the East India Company’s violence and corruption.

But just as statues of defeated Confederate generals rose in the southern United States, long after their deaths, as totems to a white supremacy that was felt to be under threat during the civil rights movement, so, in due course, Clive was subject to an equally remarkable metamorphosis: in the early 20th century, as resistance was beginning to threaten the foundations of the Raj, Lord Vulture was miraculously transformed into the heroic Clive of India. Like the erection of the Confederate statues, even at the time it was a deeply controversial matter.

In 1907 the former viceroy, Lord Curzon, recently returned from India, threw his weight behind a campaign to erect a memorial to the Victor of [the battle of] Plassey”. His successor, Lord Minto, already dealing with the serious unrest caused by Curzon’s partition of Bengal, was horrified at the proposal, and called it “needlessly provocative”. The secretary of state for India, outside whose office the statue was to be raised, wearily agreed with Minto and wrote that he was beginning to wish that Clive had been defeated at Plassey.

Today Clive’s statue stands outside the Foreign Office at the very centre of British government, just behind Downing Street. Yet clearly this is not a man we should be honouring today. If at the time many thought the statue should never have been erected, now, as we stand at this crucial crossroads after the toppling of Edward Colston, the moment has definitely come for it to be sent to a museum. There it can be used to instruct future generations about the darkest chapters of the British past.

It is not just that this statue stands as a daily challenge to every British person whose grandparents came from the former colonies. Perhaps more damagingly still, its presence outside the Foreign Office encourages dangerous neo-imperial fantasies among the descendants of the colonisers.

In Britain, study of the empire is still largely absent from the history curriculum. This still tends to go from the Tudors to the Nazis, Henry to Hitler, with a brief visit to William Wilberforce and Florence Nightingale along the way. We are thus given the impression that the British were always on the side of the angels. We remain almost entirely ignorant about the long history of atrocities and exploitation that accompanied the building of our colonial system. Now, more than ever, we badly need to understand what is common knowledge elsewhere: that for much of history we were an aggressively racist and expansionist force responsible for violence, injustice and war crimes on every continent.

We also need to know how far the British, every bit as much as the Germans, helped codify a system of scientific racism, creating a hierarchy of race that put white Caucasians at the top and blacks, “wandering Jews” and Indian Muslims at the bottom. Yet while the Germans have faced up to the darkest periods of their past, and are taught about it unvarnished in their schools, we have not even made a start to this process. Instead, while we understand that the Belgian and German empires were deeply sinister, the Raj, we like to believe, was like some enormous rose-tinted Merchant Ivory film writ large over the plains of Hindustan, all parasols and Simla tea parties, friendly elephants and handsome, croquet-playing maharajahs. 

Removing the statue of Clive from the back of Downing Street would give us an opportunity finally to begin the long overdue process of education and atonement. In 1947, at the end of the Raj, Indians removed all their imperial statues to suburban parks where explanatory texts gave them proper historical context. We could do the same. Alternately, by placing Clive and others of his ilk in a museum, perhaps one modelled on the brilliantly nuanced and hugely moving National Museum of African American History & Culture in Washington DC, we can finally begin to face up to what we have done and so begin the process of apologising for the many things we need to apologise for. Only then will we properly be able to move on, free from the heavy baggage of our imperial past.”

• William Dalrymple is the author of The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company


On the Anniversary of the Mahatma’s Death (Jan30 1948)

(Hoisted from the archives: First published on January 30th 2017)

Nehru’s Speech on the evening of Gandhi’s assassination

In my previous post written on the the 70th anniversary of India’s Independence, I remarked:

Here is the podcast of Nehru’s Independence night speech  “Tryst With Destiny”  as  “…at the midnight hour..” he announced the Independence of India.  You may note the well cadenced, Harrow and Cambridge educated, “Brown Englishman”, orating a carefully prepared speech.   

Four months after Inedpendence Day, on January 30th 1948, Gandhi was assassinated in the compound of Birla House in Delhi.  A few hours after the assassination, Nehru, climbing on the gates of Birla House,  delivered the superb, extemporaneous, emotional short speech below.  

I have found a one and a half minute sound track on the web which betrays the emotion.  

No longer do you hear or read the carefully crafted prose of a London trained lawyer.  What you will hear and read is the immediate emotional response of a broken hearted, brilliant  Indian, speaking in English, the language in which he is the most comfortable, about the death of a man he loved and looked to as a father.

The photograph of Nehru above was taken by Henri Cartier-Bresson as Nehru was standing on the gates of Birla House, at night, lit by street lights as he spoke to the nation a few hours after Gandhi’s death. Gandhi’s funeral and cremation took place the next day, as dictated by Hindu practice.  Below is the full text of Nehru’s speech broadcast over All India Radio on January 30 1948

Continue reading “On the Anniversary of the Mahatma’s Death (Jan30 1948)”

“British”,  “Indian”, “Anglo Indian”, “Domiciled European”, “Eurasian” — a History

Here is another piece pulled from my researches of two decades ago. It’s rather long (about 5000 words), but  it’s about as short as I can make it and still cover nearly five centuries of “Euro-Asian” contact.  In the piece I weave in the “Anglo Indians” Rudyard Kipling and George Orwell , my own ancestors, and the evolution of the Anglo Indian Railway Community.

Note particularly the close connection between the pre American Revolution  Eastern and Western British Empire and the East India Company which was, in the 1770s on the edge of bankruptcy.  There is a case to be  made (although I do not make it) that the English settlers in North America saw what had happened to the taxes levied on the Indians in Bengal and the North Americans wanted no part of that kind of treatment by the British Parliament.

Here is the original essay:

Continue reading ““British”,  “Indian”, “Anglo Indian”, “Domiciled European”, “Eurasian” — a History”